Research and Scholarship

Distress in Neuro-Oncology Patients and Its Implications for Communication

Carolin Roos,(1) Johannes Weller,(1) MD, Christiane Landwehr,(1) Anja Sciermoch,(2) Cathrina Duffy,(1) MD, Karoline Kohlmann,(1) MD, Christina Schaub,(1) MD, Theophilos Tzaridis,(1) MD, Matthias Schneider,(2) MD, Patrick Schuss,(2) MD, Ulrich Herrlinger,(1) MD, and Niklas Schäfer,(1) MD

From (1)Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Bonn, Germany; (2)Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Bonn, Germany

Authors’ disclosures of conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

Correspondence to: Niklas Schäfer, MD, University Hospital of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, D-53127 Bonn, Germany. E-mail: niklas.schaefer@ukbonn.de

ABSTRACT

Psychoemotional distress affects patients with cancer, including patients with a diagnosis of a malignant brain tumor. Empathy, professional expertise, and conversational skills are required to ensure successful communication with patients. The purpose of this study was to assess whether knowing the communication needs of patients would be helpful to neuro-oncologists before meeting with them. Patients in our neuro-oncology center were asked to complete the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer (DT) and a study-specific questionnaire on patients’ expectations for communication with the treating physician. The questions targeted issues such as attention/caring and awareness of their disease and prognosis. Importance ratings were compared between patients, with high vs. low distress scores to analyze the impact of distress on the patient’s needs in physician-patient communication. A total of 81 patients completed the DT and questionnaire. One third (n = 27) had IDH wild-type astrocytoma, and 42 patients (51.9%) were undergoing therapy for primary or recurrent disease. Mean distress was 4.88 (standard deviation ± 2.64) in the whole cohort, and 56.8% of patients had a high distress score (≥ 5 on a 10-point scale). All issues were assessed as important or very important for communication by the majority of patients, and importance ratings increased in patients with high distress levels for most items. Mean importance ratings correlated significantly with distress scores (p < .001). Distress was increased in neuro-oncology patients. Patients with higher distress levels considered issues of both attention/caring and medical information about the disease as more important than patients with lower distress levels. Using distress assessment may help physicians and advanced practitioners to tailor the contents of their discussion for successful communication with patients.

For access to the full length article, please sign in.